May 26, 2025: That much-publicised selfie was old, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has confirmed. But whether or how that would make the unfolding Yingluck controversy less complicated for her remains to be seen.
She said at the military airport on her return from her European tour that she had only talked to her auntie on the phone to express moral support following the Supreme Administrative Court ruling on the rice pledging compensation.
The selfie of her and Yingluck being cheek to cheek was from the past, and she did not meet the older Shinawatra while on a government trip last week, Paetongtarn told reporters.
Asked if she had met Yingluck during her European trip, Paetongtarn said: “No. But naturally we talked (on the phone) after things like this happened. I gave her my usual sympathy.”
Politically speaking, even that statement still underlines the glaring conflict of interest and dilemma of Prime Minister Paetongtarn, whose father and aunt are having problems with the Thai laws, something the young Shinawatra is supposed to defend to the best of her ability.
To be fair, a prime minister who is already embattled cannot afford to meet a fugitive relative during an official overseas trip in which he or she is accompanied by a lot of bureaucrats and politicians. That would have been a political suicide.
Some media outlets have highlighted criticism of the selfie, with big doubts, of course. Paetongtan’s insistence that it was old only confirmed the potential explosiveness of her close ties with family members having huge legal problems.
From Paetongtarn’s statement regarding Yingluck, it was not perfectly clear who called whom, although it sounded like the prime minister initiated the conversation.
Paetongtarn strongly denied that state money had been used to sponsor her “vacation” and “family business”. As a mother, the only family affair that might have bothered her while being overseas was international schooling for young people, she said.
Thailand is still serious about hosting some kinds of F1 tournaments, Paetongtarn added.
Is it the pilots or the aircraft?
May 25, 2025: Admirers are saying that not everything made in China is questionable.
Doubters are saying that it’s more of a human factor.
Either way, military experts around the world have been shocked (and stock investors excited) by a recent Indian-Pakistan air battle from which China’s Chengdu J-10C fighter jets, known as the “Vigorous Dragons”, emerged triumphant over several combat aircraft produced by the West.
The single-engine, multirole aircraft flown by Pakistan's air force was credited for the shooting down of several Indian jetfighters earlier this month, Pakistan said, a claim endorsed by several western news agencies.
Some of the downed Indian aircraft included the French-made Rafale fighters, according to Pakistan’s state news agency.
As in all battles, warriors and their tools are equally important, but a lot of military analysts including those in the West are saying that the performance of Chengdu J-10C shall never be underestimated. China has proven time and again that their products, while relatively cheap, can compete with the best and highly expensive produced elsewhere, it is said.
The Pakistan-Indian conflict is one of the first times the Chinese aircraft has been used in live combat, Business Insider reported. It added that Chengdu Aircraft Company stock soared by more than a third on the Shenzhen stock market, suggesting increasing investor confidence in the J-10C.
An international defense expert at King’s College London, was quoted by Business Insider as saying: “You may well see a very viable competitor to Western products entering contests for the purchase of new fighter aircraft."
That could pose a challenge for Western defence manufacturers, he pointed out.
Business Insider said that while the J-10C is not China's most advanced fighter (that prestigious status belongs to the fifth-generation stealth J-20), all commercial eyes should be on it.
Was Yingluck at fault? Let's ask AI
May 24, 2025: The idea of a political VAR is not totally bad.
Pheu Thai MP Worawat Ua-apinyakul has talked to ChatGPT and he said it went along with an assumption that former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra or any national leader should not be held accountable for a state policy that ends up losing a lot of money.
He did not elaborate on what “prompts” he had given the AI. To be more specific, an online comment asked Worawat whether he provided the AI with crucial pieces of information concerning corruption charges and court verdicts finding her guilty.
Simply put, the comment said it was not always illegal for a government programme to drain state coffers, but it was not all right if the government allows corruption to plague its programme.
Worawat taking the Yingluck matter to ChatGPT is an interesting concept, though. Having an AI system function as the ultimate political judge will remove many conflicts stemming from doubts, charges of bias and ideological consequences of a ruling.
If we manage to do it right, the national divide can be solved and corruption big or small can be gone.
As Worawat said, AI is strictly neutral. If it is programmed to be politically unprejudiced, it will remain unwaveringly so. In sports, if a ball is just one millimetre out of bounds, it will be called “out”, or if just the tip of a football attacker’s boot is ahead of the last defender's, it will be called “offside”, regardless of who will win or lose.
The trick is how to get the proper “prompts”. Like all judges, AI needs all the information it can get. Unlike humans, it cannot be swayed by any emotion.
We are entering the realm of science fiction, of course, but, realistically speaking, when a future AI writes history, it may go like this: “There was a time when right and wrong was decided by humans.”
Popular newscaster’s Loong Phol “revelation”
May 23, 2025: A leading news presenter perceived as being largely responsible for the “Loong Phol phenomenon” has sparked wild speculations after trying to explain why he seemed to support the murder convict.
Phutta Apiwan (a short version of his long name and family name, Phutta-apiwan Ongphrabaramee) has implied in an undated video clip that an embedded reporter of his was speaking constantly to the police.
The reporter has now become a regular commentator alongside the well-known newscaster. Both have been household names.
The video clip features both men, who said that the then reporter needed to get close to Loong Phol, whose real name is Chaiyaphol Wipa, because Amarin TV would then be among the first to get exclusives if anything happened.
Both media men insisted that they could not help it when Amarin TV’s sympathetic, close-up and day-to-day coverage made Loong Phol a national celebrity, who subsequently graced catwalks, drew millions of baht in “donations”, appeared on concert stages, became a much-sought variety TV guest, created his own products, had songs written about him, and started his own company.
Phutta-apiwan was fondly mentioned in one of the songs. Due to the phenomenon, criticism abounded regarding how the media should behave when it comes to allegations.
In December, 2023, Loong Phol was convicted by the Mukdahan provincial court for the death of his wife’s toddler niece, who had disappeared before her body was found up on a mountain. He was released on bail and is appealing the ruling, which sentenced him to 20 years in jail for manslaughter.
One of the following three possibilities will happen after the Appeals Court. Loong Phol could be set free. Or the lower court’s ruling could be upheld. Or manslaughter could become a murder attempt with an increased penalty. (He is not accused of direct murder but instead child abandonment leading to the victim’s death.)
Now, Phutta-apiwan’s clip is seen by both haters and admirers of Loong Phol as an attempt to steer clear of a controversial man. Phutta-apiwan said in the clip that he sensed something was wrong with Loong Phol and his news team was among the first that exposed suspicious backgrounds.
Both camps see Phutta-apiwan as a former supporter, but the newscaster strongly denied that, although he admitted he could not, and would not, do anything to change public opinions.
Paetongtarn's overseas trip: Fast and furious on soft-power
May 22, 2025: Identifying kickboxing and food as Thai tourism attractions is indisputable, but car racing sticks out like a sore thumb.
Make no mistake, Paetongtarn Shinawatra going to Europe to promote Thailand is good, and the country is more than capable of organising major sporting events. Yet for a trip heavily associated with the nation’s “soft-power” strengths, they arguably shouldn’t be blurred by Formula One, a far cry from our national attractions of beaches, temples and padthai.
In other words, everyone is entitled to workation, a national leader included, so it’s not wrong to attend the Formula 1 Tag Heuer Monaco Grand Prix, but why does it have to be this trip of all trips? Promoting Thai tourism one day and getting excited by tire screeches and engine roars the next might be a bit awkward.
And much of Thai cultures is slow and elaborate. The Khon dance takes its time, and so do other national performances. Western tourists love that, because they are used to something totally opposite in their countries. If they want to watch rock concerts or Taylor Swift, it doesn’t matter where. The Europeans, the target tourism market of the Paetongtarn government, will not come to Thailand to play in a casino or watch a sport that they can see at home or nearby every year.
We have “fast and furious” selling points as well, however. Asking the Europeans to come to Thailand to watch traditional boat or buffalo races, which are truly exciting and rare, can be easier and more appealing than telling them “We will have an international car race over there one day, too.”
Turnaround in famous siblings' fortunes
May 21, 2025: Best-case scenarios for Thaksin and Yingluck Shinawatra were a lot better just months ago. She was realistically expecting to return home triumphantly and he planned to continue to roam heroically.
Today, he is realistically staring at genuine imprisonment and she is probably kissing a possible homecoming goodbye.
The imminent Supreme Administrative Court’s ruling, just hours away, on whether she would have to pay a hefty compensation for rice-pledging damages incurred during her government will not affect a Supreme Court ruling on the infamous case sentencing her to jail for five years.
This means that even if the Supreme Administrative Court reaffirms a lower-court ruling sparing her from having to pay tens of billions of baht in compensation, the jail sentence will stay, and, considering the unfolding 14th floor saga affecting her brother negatively, a return to Thailand would be a big risk.
Digital Wallet postponement undermines its "merits"
May 20, 2025: Governing is about prioritising, so the government may have unknowingly devalued its own flagship policy.
Scrutinising the claim about “other emergencies” will give everyone an inconvenient conclusion, which is that Digital Wallet may not be such an urgent thing the Pheu Thai-led government always said it was after all.
The postponement has been confirmed by Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira although Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra talked about it a couple of days ago. Their casual manners belied the enormity of the government's action.
How come a “We have to have it or we die” national programme requiring unprecedentedly-large budget rearrangements and triggering confrontations with senior and credible academics and technocrats has been put on hold all of a sudden?
If it had been postponed before it started, there would have been fewer questions. Postponing it midway only implies the followings: The policy has failed to boost the economy. Or the policy has not been effective in boosting the economy. Or the policy has wreaked havoc on budgetary preparations, affecting other issues, some of them crucial.
And the postponement has come amid looming legal or constitutional troubles related to the policy, and the increasing restlessness of the conservatives who are never fans of “populist” agendas.
Whatever the reason is, Digital Wallet going down the priority list of the government is belittling itself. And this time the belittling is coming from its own advocates, not the critics.
Reading between Thida's lines
May 19, 2025: What former red-shirt leader Thida Thavornset left unsaid might make Thaksin Shinawatra think harder.
To cut a long story short, she said Thaksin should help his daughter and the prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, by actually going to prison. Thaksin staying behind real bars would alleviate her and her government’s problems, according to Thida.
The former activist was right, and she was lecturing Thaksin on the true fatherly love. Everyone knows that Thaksin loves his daughter, but a question is growing in a lot of people’s minds as to what he cares about the most.
Going to prison is not what he and Paetongtarn want, but it will help her politically. Thida was in effect telling Thaksin that there are two ways to express his love for Paetongtarn: Embarking on a gung-ho fight in a risky bid to save both himself and her, or sacrifice himself and give her a better chance in the process.
These are Thida’s exact words: “If he accepts going to prison like everybody else, it will ease the situation. It will be good for both Thaksin and Paetongtarn, for the Pheu Thai Party and for Thailand as a whole. But if Thaksin does not want to go to jail and (continue to) negotiate, I believe the problem will expand further, although it was already big over the past year.”
Will Somsak stick his neck out
May 18, 2025: Ethical points are slippery, but educational backgrounds are not. That’s why Public Health Minister Somsak Thepsuhin can face big legal risks if he decides to veto the Medical Council’s opinion on the controversial Thaksin “treatment”.
The Medical Council consists of senior professional doctors with clear-cut educational records and career paths. Somsak, on the other hand, was nowhere near medicine during his childhood, adolescence and adulthood studies. To add to that, he’s a politician.
Let’s put it this way: If you have a serious fever, or life-threatening diarrhea, or have trouble breathing, or need an immediate painkilling injection, which door will you knock, one with a label “Medical Council” and the other “Somsak Thepsuthin”?
This kind of questions will reverberate if Somsak vetoes the council’s conclusion that Thaksin Shinawatra’s transfer to the Police Hospital upon his return from exile was medically suspicious. It will also be glaring in the minds of judges if a legal or constitutional complaint is filed against Somsak in case of a veto.
The committee he has set up to help him decide whether to proceed with the council’s suggested action will keep that in mind, too.
Educational and professional backgrounds matter. And while possible ethical questions, potentially arising from Somsak’s political connections with the ruling party and the camp’s connections with Thaksin, can be subjected to varying interpretations, they can still be lethal when combined with unchangeable educational and professional records.
It takes two
May 17, 2025: The Rai Khing Temple scandal was waiting to happen no matter who the abbot was.
Anyone who says it would have been different with another abbot assumes that Thailand’s Buddhism is progressing in the correct, proper manner, and that it’s individuals, not the society, who should take the blame.
Truth, however, is that lavish donations that are today’s norms go against the very core of the religion. They court abuses. They can corrupt anyone who was previously innocent. They make the ones who are supposed to go against the flow and take lost souls back to the right path forget what they have to do.
They set bad standards and precedents. They wrongly classify “big” and “small” temples. They blur the lines dividing “good” monks. They make ordinary Thais believe that the more money they give to temples, the greater chances of going to heaven.
They make monks have absolutely-wrong expectations. Many monks accept only invitations that promise hefty materialistic pays, and turn down or downplay ceremonies that yield little worldly rewards.
They spawn scammers. The scary part is that what allegedly has taken place at the Rai Khing Temple certainly is just the tip of the iceberg. When so much money is involved with so little supervision or scrutiny, temples are a magnet for shrewd yet not-so-noble people.
Religious donations are necessary. But Evil can also look at them and say “I can do something about it.” And Evil is killing many birds with one stone, because when monks are corrupted, society will be, too, and when society loses its way, there will be nobody to bring it out of darkness.
Nothing is as it seems
May 16, 2025: The latest religious scandal should have been anything but a surprise.
It goes without saying for any scammer that the higher the credibility, the easier.
The suspect remains innocent until proven otherwise in court, of course. The now-former abbot, however, ticked the credibility box, just like the iCon executives, a well-known bitcoin promoter, a much-respected doctor and a highly-popular “people’s lawyer”, all caught for alleged fraud in recent years before him.
This is not to mention politics where dirty or allegedly dirty backgrounds of players are exposed every other day.
This is not to mention the entrainment industry where projected images sharply contrast with what really happens under the surface.
So, after politics, business and the world of entertainment celebrities, the arrest of a top monk should not make any jaw drop. Religion, for all its nobilities, can definitely draw dark people.
Room that tells a thousand words
May 15, 2025: The widely-circulated footage of the Police Hospital’s VIP room where Thaksin Shinawatra was “treated” has practically thrown gasoline on the fire.
Social media reactions basically focus on two things: the apparent luxury of the room and the absence of “emergency” life-saving equipment that treatment of critical illness requires.
Also in the reactions is the question of how much of taxpayers’ money was spent on Thaksin’s long stay.
The luxurious nature of the room had always been expected, but the timing of Thai Pakdee Party chairman Dr Warong Dechgitvigrom’s posting was perfectly anti-Thaksin. The release of the footage followed a Medical Council announcement concerning ethical questions surrounding the 14th floor controversy and will have far-reaching ramifications affecting Thai politics.
Welcome to the party!
May 14, 2025: The Thaksin question always knows no bounds.
Just as Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is pondering the questions whether or how much her father should be involved in politics, and whether the justice system has dealt with him properly, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is facing a situation that is more or less complicated.
Should Thaksin Shinawatra, a former convict disdained by much of Thailand who is facing more legal troubles in the country, be among his top advisors?
A lot of Thais do not think so. That’s why hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the Malaysian Embassy in Bangkok today, calling on Anwar, as ASEAN chair, to review his decision to give Thaksin that position.
Anwar, in a recent interview with Thai PBS World, described Thaksin as an old friend of his and denied interfering in Thailand’s internal affairs, through his appointment of Thaksin as head of the ASEAN Informal Advisory Group. Anwar said he simply wanted to make use of Thaksin’s experiences and extensive networks.
According to Anwar, there are interchanging issues or plans where Thaksin’s assets would come in handy.
Yet it’s the same thing as the Thai leadership personally and wholeheartedly embracing a Malaysian politician facing legal troubles in Malaysia, in the process ignoring the possibility that government and opposition figures may switch side in a heartbeat. If a political upheaval happens in Thailand next week or next month and the Pheu Thai Party ends up in the opposition, Anwar’s headache will get worse.
Why Trump should reject Qatar's plane
May 13, 2025: Forget ethical, constitutional and security worries. The biggest reason why the US president should not accept a jet offered as a gift from Qatar is political and economic.
Donald Trump is making the world heave a very cautious sigh of relief with the “tariff truce” with China, but he is presenting America with a new hot issue to think and talk about.
Should he accept a Qatari gift that he intended to modify into an Air Force One?
The United States is currently on fire debating ethical, constitutional and security questions stemming from his eagerness to embrace the highly-unusual gift offer. But the arguments for and against pale beside the outstanding economic and political problems that could occur.
Let’s just say Trump accepts the gift and go on to modify it into the most luxurious, sophisticated, best-armed and best-protected aircraft on the planet. And let’s just say the Democrats win the next presidential election.
The world is no stranger to American hypocrisy, but the Democrats using the plane they are denouncing as an Air Force One for their president will be an extremely-awkward sight all the same.
Currently, the Democrats have come out all guns blazing. “This is just the latest reflection of an egregious, corrupt presidency that is using the office of the presidency for his personal gain,” Rep. Dan Goldman of New York told CNN. “We want to be sure that the president of the United States is always acting in the interest, sole interest of the United States, and not on behalf of a foreign country.”
The Trump camp has floated an idea of a temporary use, meaning the next Democratic president would be able to use an Air Force One he or she is comfortable with. But then again, a substantial amount of taxpayers’ money would be required for back-and-forth construction, re-construction, modification and removal.
So, to prevent the next Democratic president from becoming a laughing-stock hypocrite and to save taxpayers’ money, the ultimate concern of any US leader, Trump should say to Qatar: Thanks, but No.
He wins
May 12, 2025: That's about it.
Trump agreeing Thaksin meet would have caused global chaos
May 11, 2025: The US president is bold, but even he surely cannot be bold enough to meet Thaksin Shinawatra.
The Appeals Court, reportedly citing the fact that there is no official words from the White House whatsoever that Trump had agreed to meet with Thaksin in Qatar, has upheld a lower court’s ruling, rejecting the former prime minister’s request to leave Thailand to attend a banquet for world leaders to be hosted by Amir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani in the Lusail palace.
Trump and Thaksin are big news for all the wrong reasons, and their “meeting” would have sent all the wrong messages to the world.
The Thai government, trying in vain to distance itself from the 14th floor controversy, can’t want Thaksin to show up at the official banquet, can it, especially after the Medical Council’s announcement?
The White House, seeking to change an image of a serial political intervener, can’t officially try to boost the status of a former convict and political lightning rod of another country, can it?
Such a meeting, if it happened, could have set a very dangerous precedent. “Persecuted” in your country? Fine. Try to get a selfie with the president of the United States and everything will be all right.
Judiciary vs executive powers
May 10, 2025: The “14th floor” episode has revived the very question at the core of the Thaksin debate lasting decades.
How much can elected rulers do against the judiciary?
Thailand’s governing system is based on a delicate yet extremely-crucial balance of three things _ parliamentary, executive and judicial powers. They are supposed to support one another, but bad politics has pitted one against another.
Parliament and the executive branch always want to wrest power from the judiciary, the main reason (or pretext if you will) being that the latter always wields its authority with prejudices. How true is that? Debate will never end.
Thaksin forced into exile and his political camp penalised time and again gave weight to the anti-judiciary argument in the past. The unfolding 14th floor development will allow the judiciary to hit back, now that it has been armed by the Medical Council’s opinion.
It’s now executive powers versus the judiciary all over again. His “treatment” at the Police Hospital was a result of complicated parliamentary politics trying to help the Pheu Thai Party win executive powers, which are obviously used in the efforts to keep him from actual prison bars.
A lot of people are thinking that if Thaksin is put behind real bars, the judiciary wins, but if he still manages to stay outside, the executive branch (with a little help from Parliament) prevails.
The old question is back. It only presents itself in a new form, and public (both local and international) opinions are changing a bit.
9/11 “conspiracy theorists” get what they want
May 9, 2025: For over two decades, doubters of the official 9/11 narrative have been, in a way, realistic and humble. By that, they wanted the mainstream media to just “talk” about their suspicions. They did not want them to believe. They wanted them to just talk about it.
Calling themselves “Truthers”, they may have finally got what they have wished for _ a mainstream media figure influential enough to make a lot others listen. News commentator Tucker Carlson, one of the most familiar household names in America, has started seriously talking about it and he promises that a series of investigative or comprehensive episodes will come.
He made the promise during an interview with a formerly-powerful politician, Curt Weldon, who is pushing for the setting up of a presidential commission to re-investigate the terror attacks on the United States that changed both the US and world histories.
Weldon was Carlson’s intended news, but the commentator has arguably become bigger news himself. And the popular newsman said everything that the “Truth movement” has always wanted to hear.
“This conversation (with Weldon) that you are about to hear raises far more questions than I ever anticipated,” Carlson said at the intro of the interview clip. “This is not a crazy person. These are not crazy questions. … After this conservation I thought it might be time to look a little more deeply into the 9/11 commission report (which blamed Arab terrorists).
“…Now is the time for a somber look, not a wild-eyed speculative look. An honest look and honest conversations …”
He stressed that outstanding questions are too “troubling” to ignore. After all, he said, 9/11 is still the most important historical event in any American life. Quoting Weldon, Carlson said there are more officials suspicious of the US government narrative than it is believed.
Crumbling of the 14th floor
May 8, 2025: When the whole Pheu Thai apparatus is concerned, the Medical Council has shaken its world.
Whether or not Thaksin Shinawatra’s latest effort to go overseas has anything to do with it, the council’s decision has confirmed public doubts about his medical “conditions” that barred him from actual prison bars upon his return from exile. And a very tricky ball is now in Public Health Minister Somsak Thepsuthin’s court.
It is an earth-shattering development that will further destabilize the Pheu Thai-led Paetongtarn government. Somsak approving the council’s action and opinion will lead to all sort of big political questions. The minister vetoing it (which would reportedly force the council to reaffirm it with a two-thirds vote) will lead to a similar situation.
Pain and gain
May 7, 2025: A joke says that every extraordinary thing you can do, a thousand Chinese kids can do it.
That is not entirely true, because otherwise China would have won football’s World Cup already. And that is not entirely about the virtues of massive numbers either, because otherwise India would have been a sporting superpower by now.
Zhao Xintong’s historic Crucible trophy win Monday night (Thailand time) is a mixture of everything it takes to reach the summit of a sport. For years and years, China has kept pushing, drawing global laughter sometimes along the way. It has held snooker tournaments, giving hefty rewards to international players for just playing in what looked like insignificant events named so exaggeratedly. The government supported the domestic existence of hundreds of thousands of snooker halls. Young Chinese prodigies were sent abroad to participate in major events, and time and time again they failed, many times utterly.
Winning snooker’s world championship which until Monday had been dominated by European players is a big deal. The unprecedented triumph was not a fluky happening that featured a Chinese boy catching big-name players napping to nick undeserved victories. Zhao’s wins were all convincing from start to finish, and he showed talent and composure that put older, more familiar snooker players to shame.
At 28, he beat Ronnie O’Sullivan, his idol, decisively on the way to the final showdown with Mark Williams, who at 50 was the oldest finalist in Crucible history, and put him to the sword with virtually one eye closed.
Nobody is playing down Zhao’s victory. Snooker is more mental than physical, meaning technology plays a lesser role than in, say, tennis, swimming or boxing, and a macho can easily lose to a person far less physically strong. And while there are claims about Chinese athletes placed under tough or authoritarian training regimes, that can’t be said about snooker.
It was O’Sullivan who gave a prophetic warning a few years ago. He practically said United Kingdom was taking long-held snooker glory for granted, and its current crop of players were too old for his comfort, with so few new-blood players emerging.
That joke aside about a thousand Chinese kids able to do any extraordinary thing you can do, Zhao’s achievement brings to mind some well-known Chinese proverbs. They include: “Failure is the mother of success”, “A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step”, and “Be not afraid of growing slowly; be afraid of standing still.”
Casinos unlikely to promote tourism
May 5, 2025: Sport stadiums and exhibition halls could generate good revenue streams, but casinos?
The Paetongtarn government’s insistence on including exclusive gambling in its planned Entertainment Complex is not logical for obvious reasons.
First, casinos will NOT draw a huge number of tourists. Government leaders say it themselves that only mega-rich people with proven wealth (not “make-believe” money in their bank accounts) would be allowed to enter. The question is, how many people are there in the world who are that wealthy?
How many Elon Musks are there in the world who would think “Let’s go to Thailand so I can gamble.”? Compare that to the guaranteed visits by backpackers and ordinary tourists flooding Thailand every year attracted by Songkran, food, beaches and varying exotic cultures.
When not enough Elon Musks of the world are coming, leniency will be tolerated and then grow. Online gambling will take advantage of loopholes and before we know it many Thai kids will get the access.
The Paetongtarn administration’s tourism argument is virtually an assumption that every Elon Musk loves to gamble, and that they will come to Thailand to do so. The government has forgotten one thing, the possibility that maybe just half of superrich people in the world like to play in the casino and maybe only half of them would choose Thailand over Las Vegas.
And talking about Las Vegas, who go there to play slot machine and blackjack? A great majority of them are risk takers hoping to get rich, not the people who are already rich.
Great sporting facilities could help Thailand become the host of key events. If managed properly, promoted suitably and supported solidly by the government, they admittedly can have a promising future.
Exhibition halls are also great, but don’t we have them already? The same goes for concert venues. Yes, they can bring in a good number of visitors if managed well. But do they need casinos to exist alongside them? No.
Did Taylor Swift reject Thailand because we didn’t have a casino? No. Do Wimbledon or UCL audiences make their decisions to travel based on whether they can gamble or not? No.
From statements of government leaders as well as Thaksin Shinawatra, legitimate gambling would account for 10% of the Entertainment Complex. Anyone investing that much money definitely would want to recoup it. And they certainly can’t rely on the Elon Musks in order to achieve that.
Classic flirting by Palang Pracharath
May 4, 2025: If rumours swirl about your opposition party ready to join the government, the first rule is keep them alive.
In other words, a total denial is a no-no. The second rule is throw in a suggestion that if you do join in the future, it would be for the country’s best interest.
You flirt by playing hard to get. But not so hard, remember. It’s a trick that all opposition parties do best.
Unless it’s utterly and absolutely hopeless, don’t slam the door shut. The photo of Pheu Thai and Bhumjaithai leaders walking hand in hand is nothing. Just keep in mind the picture of Pheu Thai and Move Forward big bosses beaming together and forming mini hearts together after the last general election.
Criticise the Palang Pracharath Party if you will, but it is observing these rules to the last letter. Instead of unequivocally saying “No, we will never support Pheu Thai after spending all our lives fighting it”, Palang Pracharath is leaving the door ajar.
And they are doing it with a near-perfect mixture of criticism and possibility of a U-turn. Paetongtarn Shinawatra is not a good prime minister and we can’t support her, Palang Pracharath says. But yes, we have been contacted. If we join, we will in effect support the one who we think is bad. But it would be fine if acceptable changes happen.
Exact words (by a Palang Pracharath deputy leader): Don’t let me tell you who contacted Gen Prawit (Wongsuwan). I was contacted, too. There was a real contact. We were told that if we wanted to do it, everyone (who is a Palang Pracharath member) must go. Gen Prawit (the Palang Pracharath leader) said we would not join, as joining would mean we support the one who (we believe) is incapable of running the country. But it’s okay if there are adjustments (in the future) that benefit the nation.”
Why 14th Floor "didn't make sense"
May 3, 2025: Alleged discrepancies may feature in the court inquiry into the “medical treatment” of Thaksin Shinawatra.
According to hardline conservative Warong Dechgitvigrom, there are questions revolving around the claims that Thaksin was critically ill, so much so that he had to be sent to the Police Hospital and stay on the 14th floor.
Here are the questions: Was there an ambulance involved, normal in a case of medical emergency? Who made the decision to send Thaksin to the Police Hospital, a senior Corrections Department doctor or a junior doctor working on a shift?
Why did Thaksin go straight to the 14th floor which was basically for a VIP patient requiring rehabilitation, not a gravely-ill man needing proper and emergency ICU-type equipment and a troop of medical experts working at full throttle?
If an operation was performed, when exactly and how was Thaksin’s conditions at the time? Medical principles tend to avoid an operation on a critically-ill person unless it is extremely necessary or a life-or-death matter.
What kind of a medical episode warrants a 180-day stay at the Police Hospital, not the Corrections Department’s hospital which has a lot of modern equipment being able to do many things including the CT scan?
Such a long stay only meant that the patient was so ill he could not get out of bed. Did Thaksin’s arms and legs shrink like those of every patient who could not walk or exercise for 180 days?
If a surgery was performed, why did they allow him to keep on staying on the 14th floor? He should have been moved to a post-surgery rehabilitation room as part of a normal post-operation procedure.
How about the visits? If Thaksin’s life was hanging by a thread, there must be throngs of visitors, mustn’t there? Who visited him during those 180 days?
The above are justifiable questions. Here are some more: From the declaration of him being an emergency case to the day he was released from the Police Hospital, there must be plenty of official and medical records along the way. Where are they, what did they say, when were they made, who prepared them and who signed them?
14th Floor inquiry can set legal precedent
May 2, 2025: It could go down to credibility of evidence and, rarely, how judges “feel” about it.
PM’s Office Minister Chusak Sirinil said the Paetongtarn government is not worried about potential trouble concerning the legal treatment of Thaksin Shinawatra, the prime minister’s father. According to Chusak, it was the Corrections Department’s full responsibility which was carried out through established procedures.
In other words, Chusak believes that even if it was decided that Thaksin was not actually jailed, political damage would not be widespread to the point of affecting the prime minister and her entire Cabinet.
“The court’s involvement is good, I think, because this matter can finally be put to rest,” he said. However, Chusak, responding to a reporter’s question, went on to admit that it would be a rare case of official documents versus public feelings.
There are those who think the stay at the 14th floor of the Police Hospital is a form of detention which took place while an inmate was ill, and there are others who believe that the stay was an illegal privilege given to Thaksin, Chusak admitted.
Reading between the lines, the inquiry could feature a showdown between documentary evidence, which is not hard to find to back the former argument, and prevalent feelings that while such evidence may look authentic, it was meant to help Thaksin evade real jail.
Judges often give importance to tangible evidence, and, normally, less attention is given to “feelings”. This case, however, involves overwhelming feelings that something was not quite right in the apparently-lawful creation of evidence.
What were those artefacts doing in US museum?
May 1, 2025: Make no mistake, the “return” was good. But how did they get there in the first place?
This is the news: “Four ancient statues of the Lord Buddha and his incarnation, which were smuggled out of Thailand more than 60 years ago and exhibited at the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco, are to be returned.”
The story, basically the official line reported similarly around the world, went on to describe the process of decision makings leading to the return to the country that owned them more than half a century ago.
It would seem like a noble process if we ignored the fact that something “smuggled” was equivalent to something “stolen” and its return to its rightful owner should not have involved such complicated layer-upon-layer agreements.
Yet it appeared that, in seeking their return, Thailand had to seek help from the US Department of Homeland Security. It’s like a thief broke into your house and your stolen valuables turned up inside the neighbour’s showcase and you have to humbly ask the neighbour to give them back to you.
The neighbour, who must have spent quite a lot of money acquiring the items, then will have two choices. First, the valuables will be immediately returned. No question asked.
Or he or she will go through a lengthy process of answering the following questions: Did we buy stolen goods and put them on display? How come we weren’t aware of that? Should we return them, since they are important to the owner’s religion and culture and we are Christian anyway, and the owner has been crying for its return for years already?
What is the right thing to do, and how quickly should we do it?
Daily updates of, and opinions on, local and global events by Tulsathit Taptim
